“Things have actually been getting tough for almost a year, now. The folks who have been affected are primarily first time buyers and the self employed—even those with a good credit (FICO) score and a decent-sized down payment.”
This could create a bit of a problem in Vancouver, where a significant percentage of young professionals are unincorporated sole proprietors who are financially responsible but who may still need someone like a parent with home equity to co-sign a loan.
Even if you do own a home, the amount of money that a bank might lend to you on your home equity lines-of-credit (HELOC) has also dropped from 100 percent to 65 percent of the appraised value of your property.
There are alternatives out there. There are what’s known as “B-lenders” or private lenders, who will charge a one to two percent fee along with a mortgage rate that can be as high as 10 percent. “So, right away you’re paying $1000 - $2000 on every $100,000 you borrow, and higher monthly mortgage payments.”
So, perhaps there is a grain of truth to the recent comments from BC Real Estate Association Cameron Muir that new mortgage rules choked home sales in the Lower Mainland over the summer.
This summer, Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Finance Minister Jim Flaherty took a regulatory hammer to Canada’s housing markets, causing condo sales to plummet in Toronto, and sinking Vancouver house prices by jaw-dropping margins.
Or so the finance and real estate industries would have you believe.
To hear Canada’s banks, industry groups and even the Conference Board tell it, the slowdown that descended on many Canadian housing markets over the summer is the fault of the strict new mortgage rules Flaherty put into place this past June.
The media are happy to go along with it, because it offers a neat and simple explanation for why Canada's decade-long housing boom is coming to a halt. The only problem is, this isn’t what’s happening.
First the background: Flaherty tightened the rules for mortgages for the fourth time in as many years this past June, reducing the maximum length of a mortgage insured by the CMHC to 25 years from 30, effectively making that the maximum amortization period for most Canadians who take out mortgages. He also reduced the maximum amount you can borrow against the value of your house to 80 per cent from 85 per cent. These changes, like the previous ones, were aimed at ensuring that Canada's rising home prices weren't due to irresponsible lending and borrowing.
The be sure, this will have a cooling effect on the housing market. There are prospective home buyers who just can’t afford the extra $140 per month, on average, that the shorter mortgage periods represent. Some homebuyers have just been priced out of the market. But can that alone explain the 70-per-cent drop in condo sales in Toronto, or the nine-per-cent drop in house prices in Vancouver?
Highly unlikely. TD Bank forecast the impact of the mortgage rule changes on the housing market and found it would amount to a three per cent decrease in house prices -- far less than what Vancouver, for one, has already seen. Not to mention, we’ve had three previous rounds of mortgage rule tightening since 2008, and none of them tipped the market downward. Clearly, something else is happening here.
The housing market’s fundamentals aren’t looking good. Standing in the way is that pesky basic law of economics — supply and demand. In some Canadian markets, those two things have become entirely detached from one another.
As the CEOs of both BMO and RBC have attested, Canada’s real estate market is simply overbuilt -- particularly in Toronto, where condo construction has grown so thoroughly out of hand that there are now twice as many high-rises going up there as there are in New York City.
And more, much more, construction is being planned.
In Vancouver, where residential construction has been somewhat more restrained than in Toronto in recent years, the supply-demand disconnect is reflected in prices, which have flown so high that Vancouver has nearly as many houses listed for sale over $1 million as sell in the entire United States in a month. The city's housing costs ranked as the second least affordable in the world, after Hong Kong, in a recent survey.
Across the country, house prices are now 35 per cent higher relative to income than has been the long-term trend through history, Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney noted earlier this year.
Simply put, prices are too high. Canadians aren't earning enough to justify these price levels.
And closely linked to this is the elephant in the room: debt. It has never been cheaper to take on debt in Canada. With a global financial crisis busting out all around, the Bank of Canada dropped its base interest rate to one per cent in January, 2009, and it has stayed at or below that level for nearly four years now.
All this has had an alarming effect on household balance sheets. StatsCan recently revised its measurement of household debt to make it more in line with international norms, and found the debt-to-income ratio hovering at a record 163.4 per cent, higher than the level the U.S. had when its housing market began a years-long decline half a decade ago.
That offers more of a clue to why Canada’s housing market has peaked and appears to be on a downward trajectory. It’s basic mathematics writ small in the finances of households across the country — there’s just no more breathing room to borrow more money.
Whatever the terminology, house prices have to come down relative to incomes. Then and only then can they return to healthy, stable levels of growth.
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.