Showing posts with label Reuters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reuters. Show all posts

Monday, March 5, 2012

Mon Post #2: The shifting sands in China spells bad news for those in real estate relying on HAM


One of the arguments you hear from locals who dismiss concerns that our real estate prices have surpassed what local incomes can support is that Vancouver is in high demand and endless streams of wealthy Asian investors will buy what locals cannot afford to purchase.

As we have noted here before, China's history is replete with boom and bust cycles. In addition, the policies of the US Federal Reserve have been exporting inflation to the far east.  At some point China is going to react and begin focusing their economy inward.

Few people believe this is going to happen. Fewer still fully understand the repercussions this will have on the world economy.

Evidence that this trend is starting in earnest comes today from Reuters who report that Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao has cut his nation's 2012 growth target to an eight-year low of 7.5%. Wen Jiabo has made boosting consumer demand the year's first priority as Beijing looks to wean the economy off its reliance on external demand and foreign capital.

"We will improve policies that encourage consumption," Wen told nearly 3,000 delegates of the Communist Party-controlled legislature.

China has vowed to wean the economy off dependence on exports, smoke-stack industries and government-backed infrastructure, and promote balanced growth that will elevate the incomes and spending of farmers and workers.

The lower growth numbers just reflect the reality that growth is going to be slower because the rest of the world is going to be weaker. China is in for some rough times ahead. And rough times means less money for entrepreneurs to spend overseas.

China could be headed for its slowest full-year of growth in the last ten years. The economy ended 2011 with its slackest quarter of growth in 2-1/2-years at 8.9% as it felt the chill of the euro area debt crisis and a sluggish U.S. economy.

The outlook for the real economy remains cloudy, according to the latest surveys of China's vast factory sector and the burgeoning services industries that are key to rebalancing growth and generating more stable domestic-driven demand.

The Premier also pledged to curb speculative demand in the property market. The government will continue to defuse rising local government debt, regarded by many investors as the key risk to fiscal sustainability (and the source of the liquidity for the exploding Chinese real estate market). Government figures show about 10.7 trillion yuan ($1.7 trillion) was owed by local governments at the end of 2010.

Chinese investors (who have been spending money like drunken sailors on Vancouver Real Estate) are about to experience huge cash flow issues. Somehow I suspect what money is available for investments, that money isn't going to be spent in a real estate market that EVERYONE can clearly see is overvalued and ripe for a major correction.

==================

Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
Please read disclaimer at bottom of blog.

Saturday, November 12, 2011

Vancouver's SFH price now 3 times greater than that of New York City's


I was perusing the discussion forum over on the blog Vancouver Condo Info and vanpro has posted a link to an interesting Reuters story on home prices in the United States.

Titled 'Home prices decline in NYC area, rise in Boston', it seems home values are continuing their decline in much of the United States.  In the third quarter, values fell in almost three-fourths of all U.S. cities as Americans become more pessimistic about real estate values.

Perhaps the most interesting statistic is the fact that the median price of a single-family home in the New York metropolitan area has fallen another 3.6% and currently sits at $389,600.

As vanpro notes, metropolitan New York has a population 6 TIMES larger than the entire Greater Vancouver region, which sits on way less land than we have here.

Factor in the fact New York is still one of the great financial centres of the world with incomes and wealth way beyond that of Vancouverites and you have a situation where a Vancouver SFH sells for 3 times that of the New York SFH, which is nothing short of astonishing.

==================

Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
Please read disclaimer at bottom of blog.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Stagflation, anyone? (updated)

It is said that history doesn't repeat itself, but often follows similar patterns.

And if you have followed this blog for any length of time you know my thoughts about inflation are that we are following patterns similar to what we experienced in the 1970s.

Since Quantative Easing began in 2009, I have cautioned that the biggest looming threat is not deflation, but the inevitable inflation that all this liquidity is going to trigger combined with a stagnating economy.

Inflation is already with us.

It has been taking root around the world for the past 6 months, machinations of a deliberate monetary policy to debase the world’s reserve currency.

All that debasement has had one objective... the creation of a little inflation to get America and the west out of the deflationary spiral caused by the failure of those horrid financial instruments known as OTC Derivatives and un-payable government debt.

Around the world, inflation has erupted in global food prices. Most of the world has no savings to get through difficult times and “hedge” inflationary outcomes.

Those outcomes appear quickly and change realities violently. American monetary policy and the global “race to debase” is the reason you are seeing raging crowds on TV from Ireland to Greece and Egypt.

Looking at China and India alone, despite the fact that the yuan and rupee rose 2.4% and 1.3% respectively against the dollar through November of last year, inflation rates in both countries dwarfed the relatively tame readings we are reporting in North America; Chinese consumer prices up 4.4% and India's up 8.6%.

Frequently you hear people say "if inflation is such a problem, why isn't it registering in the consumer price index?"

The answer to this supposed riddle of non-existent inflation: inflation is all in how you measure it.

In North America food, along with energy have been stripped out of our CPI, and the result is a more tame inflation reading.

But those price pressures still exist notwithstanding.

30 years ago when Ronald Reagan entered the White House, it was precisely the spike in food and energy - ignored today - that had Reagan and others so concerned about inflation.

Times change, and governments become slick and manipulative, and now those price pressures have supposedly 'disappeared'.

Calculate inflation today the way it was calculated in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s and the federal government's measure of inflation would be substantially higher than what we are currently being told.

Once you understand that... then the latest statements from the Governor of the Bank of England that standards of living are about to plunge are not all that surprising.

Mervyn King, Britain’s counterpart to the Bank of Canada's Mark Carney, has delivered a stern, sobering message to his country:

  • "In 2011, real wages are likely to be no higher than they were in 2005... One has to go back to the 1920s to find a time when real wages fell over a period of six years."

    "The Bank of England cannot prevent the squeeze on real take-home pay that so many families are now beginning to realise is the legacy of the banking crisis and the need to rebalance our economy."

    "The squeeze on living standards is the inevitable price to pay for the financial crisis and subsequent rebalancing of the world and UK economies."

    "Furthermore, inflation may rise to somewhere between four per cent and five per cent over the next few months."

    "The idea that (we) could have preserved living standards, by preventing the rise in inflation without also pushing down earnings growth further, is wishful thinking."

    "Unpleasant though it is, the Monetary Policy Committee neither can, nor should try to, prevent the squeeze in living standards, half of which is coming in the form of higher prices and half in earnings rising at a rate lower than normal."

    "I sympathise completely with savers and those who behaved prudently now find themselves among the biggest losers from this crisis.”

The Governor of the Central Bank of England has looked his country in the eye and admitted that he is completely powerless to prevent the inevitable decline in living standards that inflation and a stagnating economy are about to ravage upon us.

Meanwhile in Canada, our Central Banker has been sounding alarm bells since last February about high debt and the impact of significant looming interest rate hikes combined with an economy that will not grow fast enough to offset them.

Both Governors can see what's coming.

And as the blog has repeatedly posted, it's all about inflation, a stagnating economy and the looming spectre of rising interest rates.

Meanwhile Reuters reports that more manufacturer's are warning of rising input costs.

Emerson CEO David Farr said inflation ran well ahead of the company's own projections, and the company was spending three times as much on materials as on labor.

"We'll have to significantly increase prices around the world because this is not a momentary blip," Farr told analysts on the company's conference call.

"In my opinion, I think net material inflation could run at higher levels for the next two or three years. That's a plus and a minus in many regards but in reality this is an issue we'll have to deal with. It's not going away."

Earlier this week, Illinois Tool Works, which makes a variety of products for the automotive, residential construction, and industrial marketplace, warned it might not be able to fully recoup all the raw material price increases it is seeing - even though it expects to raise prices this year.

Officially it's known as cost-push inflation. Wages don't rise, jobs don't increase and the economy founders, but manufacturing costs rise anyways pushing up prices.

QE1 and QE2 are the causes. And now there's talk of QE3.

Inflation has only just started.

==================

Email: village_whisperer@live.ca

Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.

Please read disclaimer at bottom of blog.