==================
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
As I said yesterday, a battle is brewing between those who believe in stimulus and those who argue for a return to austerity.
In several articles for his New York Times column, Paul Krugman has argued that those who push for austerity in the face of recession are either doing so for political expediency or out of a “crazy” fealty to archaic economic views. Krugman believes the trillions of dollars worth of deficit spending unleashed by the United States and European governments in the last 24 months is inadequate. He believes our only remedy is to spend more – no matter how much debt results.
Reading straight from the Keynesian playbook, Krugman argues that cutting government spending now will simply send the economy back into recession. He asserts that by flooding the economy with money, i.e. “stimulus,” governments can encourage consumers to spend. Once the spending creates better conditions, so the argument goes, the economy will be better positioned to withstand the spending cuts, tax hikes, and higher interest rates necessary to address the staggering deficits left behind.
Curiously the person leading the banner for a return to austerity is the recently reformed former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan. In a recent Wall Street Journal editorial, Greenspan argued that the best economic stimulus would be for the world’s leading debtors (the United States, UK, Japan, Italy, et al) to rein in their budget deficits. Greenspan explains that because lower deficits will restore confidence, diminish the threat of inflation, and allow savings to flow to private-sector investment rather than public-sector consumption, the short-term pain will lead to gains both in the mid and long-term. Rather than redistributing a shrinking pie, this approach allows the pie to grow. Greenspan’s view has been echoed loudly in the highest policy circles of Berlin, Ottawa, Moscow, Beijing, and Canberra.
But while Alan Greenspan may have had a profound conversion, current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has not.
Insiders suggest that Bernanke is waging an epochal battle behind the scenes for control of US monetary policy, struggling to overcome resistance from regional Fed hawks for further possible stimulus to prevent a deflationary spiral.
Fed watchers say Bernanke and his close allies, key members of the five-man Board, are quietly mulling a fresh burst of asset purchases, if necessary by pushing the Fed's balance sheet from $2.4 trillion (£1.6 trillion) to uncharted levels of $5 trillion.
The dispute has echoes of the early 1930s when the Chicago Fed stymied rescue efforts.
"We're heading towards a double-dip recession," said Chris Whalen, a former Fed official and now head of Institutional Risk Analystics. "The party is over from fiscal support. These hard-money men are fighting the last war: they don't recognise that money velocity has slowed and we are going into deflation. The only default option left is to crank up the printing presses again."
Mr Bernanke is so worried about the chemistry of the Fed's voting body – the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) – that he has persuaded vice-chairman Don Kohn to delay retirement until Janet Yellen has been confirmed by the Senate to take over his post. Mr Kohn has been a key architect of the Fed's emergency policies. He was due to step down this week after 40 years at the institution, depriving Mr Bernanke of a formidable ally in policy circles.
"The US recovery is in imminent danger of stalling," said Stephen Lewis, from Monument Securities. "Growth could be negative again as soon as the fourth quarter. There is no easy way out since fiscal stimulus has already been pushed as far as it can credibly go without endangering US credit-worthiness."
All these developments have prompted the Royal Bank of Scotland's credit chief Andrew Roberts to warn RBS clients to prepare for 'monster' money-printing by the Federal Reserve.
"We cannot stress enough how strongly we believe that a cliff-edge may be around the corner, for the global banking system (particularly in Europe) and for the global economy. Think the unthinkable," Roberts said in a note to investors.
Societe Generale's uber-bear Albert Edwards said the Fed and other central banks will be forced to print more money whatever they now say, given the "stinking fiscal mess" across the developed world. he said.
In light of all of this... is it any wonder people are concerned for their financial future?
==================
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
So the OMG-20 confab is over.
And the world leaders have had a chance to reflect on the situation in the Western world's economy.
For the last two years the economic policy of the West has been all about preventing deflation and curing recession by pouring vast amounts of public money into the system in a belief it would ignite a new era of prosperity.
It hasn't.
At best the economy of the West has merely muddled along.
Of course this isn't the way it was 'supposed' to play out. Usually 'stimulus' applied after a steep recession leads to a snappy recovery, like it did in 1983-84 after the Reagan tax cuts.
But as I have said on numerous occasions, we still do not fully appreciate the depth, breadth and scope of the 2008 Financial Crisis. A deep economic earthquake has occurred. And the full reprecussions are still not appreciated or understood.
Do you remember when the West started pouring money into this?
Under George W. Bush, Congress was told that a "timely, targeted and temporary" spending program of $150 billion was urgently needed to boost consumer "demand".
When the Democrats assumed control in Congress, they continued with the idea.
And the stimulus produced a slight increase in GDP growth in mid-2008, but it didn't stop the financial panic and second phase of recession.
That lead to the second round of "stimulus". $862 billion worth in February 2009. At the time a pair of White House economists famously promised that this spending would keep the unemployment rate below 8%.
It didn't.
The US jobless rate is still 9.7% and the GDP estimate for first quarter growth has been reduced again, this time to 2.7%.
And what do the Americans want to do now?
Why... more 'stimulus', of course.
The problem is the Western world's Keynesian political consensus is falling apart.
In Europe, the bond vigilantes have attacked the finances of Greece, Portugal and Spain, with Britain and Italy next in line.
Politicians are scrambling away fromt the 'stimulus' mindset to one focused on cutting spending and raise taxes.
Britain has introduced an austerity budget and Germany's Angela Merkel sees vindication for keeping her country's stimulus far more modest than other Western nations.
In America many Republicans and Democrats are rebelling against a third round of stimulus. The original White House package of jobless benefits and aid to the states had to be watered down several times, and the latest version failed again in the Senate late last week.
Some will argue that the world has now reached a Keynesian dead end.
But other's suggest the spending/debt party may have only just begun.
More on that tomorrow...
==================
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
In California they are gridlocked over how to close a $19 billion budget gap and are weighing the termination of the main welfare program for 1.3 million poor families or borrowing more than $9 billion in the bond market.
Illinois, tied with California for the lowest credit rating of any state, is diverting a rising portion of tax revenue to service debt.
Finances in Arizona, New Jersey, New York and other states show few signs of improvement.
In total Forty-six states face budget shortfalls that add up to $112 billion for the fiscal year ending next June, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a Washington research institution.
“States are going to have to cut back spending and raise taxes the same way Greece and Spain are,” says Dean Baker, co- director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington. “That runs counter to stimulating the economy and will put a big damper on the recovery in the latter half of this year.”
It appears that across the United States, all that stimulus money is drying up and States don’t have a choice anymore, their problems are going to require major surgery.
The risk is that California ends up like Greece, with no one trusting that it can get its financial house in order, says Steve Westly, California’s Democratic treasurer from 2003 to 2007. “It has to be a combination of cuts and revenue increases,” he says.
Will the federal government hang the US States out to dry or will they bail them out like they did Wall Street?
==================
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
Germany's Deutsche Bank has a new and improved index of U.S. financial conditions and after analyzing current conditions they have concluded that US financial conditions have just collapsed back to the lows of the immediate post-Lehman crisis levels.
Meanwhile Bank of America Corp., the second- largest U.S. home lender, added 2,000 employees since April to work with borrowers having trouble paying their mortgages. The lender now has more than 18,000 workers in “default management,” a 60% increase since January 2009.
As housing goes, so goes stimulus. Expect to see the pressure to resume programs that support housing intensify as market trends deteriorate.
Meanwhile credit conditions or liquidity are once again tightening (spreads widening) as the economy is losing momentum from waning stimulus.
In other news, Freddie's most recent mortgage rates are out and they are the lowest in history. With the US Federal Reserve now looking at emergency interest rates staying low until 2013 or beyond, the only true recourse is even more monetary stimulus.
Albert Edwards, one of the most prominent uber-bears just got even more bearish: "Our view that this economic and market recovery will collapse like a pack of cards as soon as the steroid-like stimulus is reduced is gaining ground. Most forward-looking leading indicators now signal some sort of second-half slowdown. The only area of debate now seems to be in its magnitude. By the end of this year, I believe we will be back in recession."
Albert's vision is that we are entering a deflationary collapse, following by a reactionary episode in which the Fed ends up printing tens trillions in one last attempt to restimulate the economy, resulting in hyperinflation.
We certainly do live in intersting times.
==================
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
So as stats come out showing that the Real Estate market in Vancouver and Canada is stalling (albeit while contradictory reports flood the media that Asian money is buying up everthing in sight in the Lower Mainland of BC), it begs the question... how's the recovery going in the US?
Not so good, apparently (see chart above).
The US Commerce Department reported that new home sales in America plunged 33% to an all-time low in May following the expiration of the government’s homebuyer tax credit in April. If not for the massive downward revision to the April sales total, from an annual rate of 504,000 to 446,000, the monthly decline would have been more than 40%
Furthermore the May sales rate of 300,000 units is coming in well below the previous record low which was set in January of 2009 (339,000 units). In population-adjusted terms, the May new home sales total represents a decline of about 40% from the pre-2008 low of 400,000 seen in January of 1991.
In short... the situation in the United States is worse than ever.
And with Europe in financial dire straights, an important stage of the financial crisis of 2008 is about to play out.
Since the crisis began a debate has raged, a battle.
On one side are those who espouse Keynesian economics - combat the crisis by spending endlessly to avoid deflation and another depression.
On the other side are those that believe austerity is exactly what the system needs to purge the credit-crazed and real estate-mad phase we have been riding since 1980.
In Canada our Keynesian experiment involved massive bank bailouts, although listening to the malarky being spouted now, our country never threw a dime at the crisis.
We are told that the securitization phenomenon that let U.S. banks sell dubious mortgages to unsuspecting buyers never developed in Canada. Only about one-quarter of Canadian mortgages were securitized in 2007 (it was 60% in the U.S.), and they were solid, government-insured mortgages, not sliced, diced, leveraged subprime junk.
The 'solid' Canadian banking system saved the day, goes the platitude, and that's why in the U.S. (and elsewhere) near-zero interest rates haven't inflated housing prices. America's banking system is so sick that there just isn't much lending, while ours is healthy.
The fact is our government threw everything they could at the crisis in order to keep our real estate market juiced and our banks afloat.
That's why credit continues to flow in this country. The Federal government is guaranteeing all that money.
We've thrown so much money at the problem that Kevin Page, the controversial Parliamentary Budget Officer came out and said that the Federal Government's orginally announced 2 year deficit (since expanded to 5 years) is now worse and that there's no way we’ll be balancing our books in 2014. Canada now has a deficit so large it is now structural and will probably be with us for an entire generation.
But because America and Europe have been spending like drunken sailors, record setting debt seems tame by comparision.
The question now is which way is the world going to turn?
Keep spending and ramping up sovereign debt or slashing debt.
A giant philosophical battle is about to intensify.
==================
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
I have been following an interesting discussion on another blog and it raises a fascinating point.
What are the ramifications of the BP crisis in the Gulf of Mexico from a financial perspective?
This is a line of thought that suggests the events in the Gulf could lead to an acceleration of the crisis brought about by the Lehman implosion.
Apparently a significant amount of liquidity in the global financial world is dependent on a solvent BP. BP extends credit – lots of it - through trading and finance.
So much, in fact, that the amounts, quality and duration of credit is on such a scale that a regular bank could only dream of. The financial muscle behind a company with 100+ years of proven oil and gas reserves dwarfs that with a bank (with few tangible assets) possesses.
What happens if BP goes under?
With proven reserves and wells in the ground, equity in fields all over the planet, nothing can match a major oil company in terms of credit quality and credit provision.
How many assets around the planet are dependent on credit and finance extended from BP? It is likely to dwarf any banking entity in multiples.
And at the heart of all that credit is a rat's nest of over-the-counter derivatives.
As a blogger posted, "Banks try and lean on major oil companies because they have exactly the kind of credit-worthiness that they themselves lack. In fact, major oil companies, conversely, spend large amounts of time both denying Banks credit and trying to get Bank risk off of their books in their trading operations. Oil companies have always mistrusted bank creditworthiness and have largely considered the banking industry a bad financial joke. Banks plead with oil companies to let them trade beyond one year in duration. Banks even used to do losing trades with oil companies simply to get them on their trading register... a foot in the door so that they could subsequently beg for an extension in credit size and duration. For the banks, all trading was based on what the early derivatives giant, Bankers Trust, named their trading system: RAROC – or, Risk Adjusted Return on Credit. Trading is a function of credit bequeathed, mixed with the risk of the (trading) position. As trading and credit are intertwined, we might do well to remember what might happen to global liquidity and markets if BP suffers what many believe to be its deserved fate of bankruptcy. The Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) has already been and will be further undermined by BP’s distress. They are one of the only 'hard asset' entities backing up this so-called exchange."
If BP does go bust (or even if it is just badly wounded) and the US entity is allowed to fail, the long-term OTC derivatives in the oil, refined products and natural gas markets that get nullified could be catastrophic.
These will kick-back into the banking system. BP is the primary player on the long-end of the energy curve. How exposed are Goldman sub J. Aron, Morgan Stanley and JPM? Probably hugely.
Credit has been cut to BP. Counter-parties will not accept their name beyond one year in duration. This is unheard of.
If BP falls, the very earth may shake as it hits the ground.
Mark Carney spoke this week on the perilous condition of the world financial markets.
And in the midsts of founding banks and faltering sovereign entities, we now have a major oil company on the verge of going under.
Another leg of the global economic “chair” is being viciously kicked out.
What will be the effects of a BP failure? Many speculate that it could easily be equal to that of a Lehman, if not more because the world is highly reliant on BPs provision of long-term credit to many core industries. Who makes good on all the outstanding paper that so many smaller oil, gas and electricity companies, airlines, shipping companies, local bus, railway and transportation networks that rely on BPs creditworthiness and performance for?
It doesn’t take a genius to figure out how this could all unwind. If BP has to be bailed-out, like a bank, the system will have to print even more unimaginable amounts of money.
The fact of the matter is that a BP crisis could unleash damage similar to the banking crisis. A BP failure through bankruptcy could make Lehman look small in comparison, and shake the world wide financial house of cards even more severely.
==================
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.

And how is real estate doing less than half the distance immediately south from Vancouver than if you were to travel east to Chilliwack?
It's a completely different world.
While real estate boomed in the lower mainland, the recently released 32nd edition of the Whatcom County Real Estate Research Report tells us that the bedroom community to Vancouver just over the border was well into the "bust" phase of the housing cycle at the end of 2009, with single-family sales down 50% from the peak and single-family permits down 75% from the peak.
And while longer term the county's housing market "will likely benefit from the locational advantages of the region, including an abundance of recreational amenities and its position as a lower-cost alternative to Vancouver and Seattle", right now it is sucking wind.
The number of Whatcom County homes sold last year (2,204) was the lowest annual total since 1995. The peak year was 2004, when 4,454 homes were sold. The median price last year was $259,900, the lowest since 2005. Last year, 186 homes sold for under $150,000, a 31% increase from 2008.
Meanwhile a few kilometres to the north lies the land of the million dollar single family homes.
Quite the contrast, isn't it?
Yet so many remain in denial about the perilous situation we are sitting in.
==================
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
We will file this one under the heading, 'Black Swan Alert'.
Arabic newspaper Al-Quds al-Arabi reports that 12 American warships, among which one aircraft carrier, as well as one Israeli corvette, and possibly a submarine, have crossed the Suez Canal on their way to the Red Sea.
Concurrently, thousands of Egyptian soldiers were deployed along the canal to protect the ships.
The passage disrupted traffic into the Suez canal for the "longest time in years." The Jerusalem Report confirms this passage.
Two other carriers are already deployed in the region, with the CVN-73 Washington in the western Pacific as of May 26, and the CVN-69 Eisenhower supporting operation Enduring Freedom as of May 22.
It isn't clear what the third carrier group may be yet but reports suggest it is almost certainly the CVN-75 Harry S. Truman (pictured above).
This follows reports by the Times newspaper of London that Israel has deployed three nuclear cruise missle armed submarines along the Iranian coastline.
HT: Zero Hedge.
These developments add credence to the rumours about munitions stockpiling on the British island of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean.
Back in March the Scottish newspaper, The Sunday Hearld, revealed that the US government signed a contract in January, 2010 to transport 10 ammunition containers to Deigo Garcia. According to a cargo manifest from the US navy, this included 387 “Blu” bombs used for blasting hardened or underground structures.
The suggestion was that these powerful US “bunker-buster” bombs were being shipped in preparation for a possible attack on Iran.
Experts speculated that the bombs were being put in place for an assault on Iran’s controversial nuclear facilities. There has long been speculation that the US military is preparing for such an attack, should diplomacy fail to persuade Iran not to make nuclear weapons.
Although Diego Garcia is part of the British Indian Ocean Territory, it is used by the US as a military base under an agreement made in 1971.
==================
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
Alan Greenspan is in the news again today repeating what should be the overriding concern of everyone in North America.
The former Federal Reserve Chairman has penned an op ed piece in the Wall Street Journal. In it Greenspan argues that the runaway Federal Deficit threatens to turn the US into the next Greece. He doesn't actually think that the US debt bears any credit risk, due to our ability to print at will, but that there is a substantial risk that borrowing costs will soar.
That last part is particularly important because as you all know, soaring interest rates are what would absolutely decimate the real estate market here on the Village on the Edge of the Rainforest.
1980 style interest rates on a $600,000 mortgage would push monthly payments up to over $11,000 per month. Not too hard to envision massive collapse under those circumstances.
When liquidating all those foreclosed properties, the only way banks could find buyers for these properties (assuming they could find buyers to make similar $3,000 per month mortgage payments) would be if the selling price of these homes came down to $165,0000.
Considering how many homes would be on the market, $100,000 would be a more realistic price point on these homes.
But a real estate collapse on that magnitude seems like science fiction to everyone today. But should it?
Look what is happening today. A simple 0.25% increase in the Bank of Canada rate, tighter mortgage rules and the looming HST have triggered a 10% drop in nationwide real estate sales and - in some cases - a 34% drop in the selling price of some high end homes.
With that in mind, is a drop of 80% in real estate values so outlandish if interest rates were to return to +20% levels?
Of course that's the rub. No one believes interest rates will ever go up significantly again.
And part of that rationalization is that the US Federal Reserve Chairman would never allow that to happen.
But here is the former chairman, Greenspan, noting that market participants are aware of America's towering deficit, yet yields continue their long march lower. Says Greenspan: "This is regrettable, because it is fostering a sense of complacency that can have dire consequences."
Greenspan knows that rates are set by the bond market - they can only be influenced by the Fed.
And the former head of the Federal Reserve is scared that while the bond market is currently driving rates down (creating the complanency he speaks of), this patter can - and will - change on a dime. When the bond market loses confidence in the US financial picture (which it inevitably will), interest rates will soar.
If he's worried, shouldn't we be concerned too?
But we're not.
And not only is Canadian complacency firmly entrenched, we're in outright denial that a problem even exists. And the perfect example of this denial was presented this week by Jay Bryan of the Montreal Gazette newspaper.
Bryan parrots the line that the politicians and banks have been bleating: that our real-estate rebound was possible because Canada's banking system (unlike America's) remained in good health. Cheap mortgage loans helped repair the modest damage to prices inflicted by the downturn. And that concern about the real estate market is nothing more than fearmongering by those "prone to panic attacks or the temptation to sensationalize."
Bryan argues that we can relax because our future is one in which skyrocketing prices will quickly cool as predictable market forces come into operation.
Joining in on the 'nothing to see here' mantra is Pascal Gauthier of the Toronto Dominion Bank. He says the housing bubble scenario promoted by those doomsayers makes little sense to experienced observers of the housing market.
Gauthier argues that there hasn'st been any sign of a bubble in Canadian real estate. What Canada has experienced was modest overvaluation with very little sign of speculation. The outlook, Gauthier believes, is for a modest fall in clearly overpriced markets, like Vancouver and Toronto, pulling down the national average price by a modest 7%.
Uh-huh. Sounds identical to the tale being told by American real estate defenders in late 2005 (hattip: Vancouver Condo Info).
I agree with Greenspan.
The current environment of low, low interest rates is fostering a sense of complacency that will have dire consequences.
Ignoring that fact is nothing more than burying your head in the sand. Especially considering the dramatic impact it will have on our housing market - and our lives.
==================
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
(click on photos to enlarge)
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
Please read disclaimer at bottom of blog.
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
"It's different this time."
That's the powerful phrase that, for many real estate bloggers, is the embodiment of rationalization in the housing bubble.
We all know it is just that... rationalization. But it's fascinating how easy it is to lose sight of that understanding. More on that momentarily.
In 1987 Paul Kennedy first published The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict From 1500 to 2000. The book explores the politics and economics of the Great Powers from 1500 to 1980 and the reason for their decline.
Kennedy argues that the strength of a Great Power can be properly measured only relative to other powers, and he provides a straightforward and persuasively argued thesis: Great Power ascendency (over the long term or in specific conflicts) correlates strongly to available resources and economic durability; military "over-stretch" and a concomitant relative decline are the consistent threat facing powers whose ambitions and security requirements are greater than their resource base can provide for.
We would all like to think the U.S. will not suffer the same problems as those who came before it... the Soviet Union, Great Britian, France, Prussia, Austria-Hungary, etc.
The fact of the matter is that the U.S. is already dealing with too much debt and not enough money. The cracks in the economy are getting bigger, not smaller, as the “recovery” camp would have you believe. 40 million U.S. citizens on now food stamps — a new record. It was reported just last Friday that “Up to 300,000 Public School Teachers May Lose Their Jobs This Year Due to Local Budget Cuts.”
And since the individual U.S. states cannot print money, the U.S. federal government is going to try to save teaching jobs with an emergency federal spending bill. It will mean an additional $23 billion to the deficit. Illinois has reportedly stopped paying its bills. Contractors are owed $4.4 billion, and nonpayment may cause a wave of bankruptcies in that state. There are nearly 3 dozen other U.S. states facing similar severe budget problems.
In the latest report from Shadowstats.com, economist John Williams says look out for another nasty downturn in the economy because the money supply (M3) is shrinking. Williams writes, “... near-term economic activity will turn down, with major negative implications for the federal budget deficit, U.S. Treasury fundings, systemic solvency and the U.S. dollar. Such developments should place significant upside pressure on domestic inflation. U.S. difficulties eventually should dwarf the European sovereign solvency concerns”
So, what will perform well in this environment?
That, my friends, is the question I get peppered with half a dozen times each day.
Williams believes you better start looking for an exit if you are holding dollars, stocks or bonds. According to Williams, “the long-term outlook for the U.S. dollar and U.S. equity and credit markets remains bleak, while the long-term outlook for gold and silver remains extremely strong.”
Yesterday we talked about the BMO report "Go To Cash" which was advising it's clients to dump equities.
Reflections from the Doomer side of the net?
Hard to say.
No one can deny debt is out of control.
Some would suggest that this is no time for emotion to overtake reason. Reason being smart investments in tried and true economic vehicles which, under normal circumstances, are sure to be wise choices as the economy recovers.
Normalcy, we are cautioned, will return.
But evidence is mounting that - in the broader terms of history - we are at that turning point encounted by of the former powers. That same turning point which was undeniable for Prussia, Austria-Hungary, France and Great Britain.
In the face of all the mounting issues for the United States, in the face of all the mounting evidence... can we really deny what is happening around us.
Isn't it tantamount to saying it will be different this time... different this time for the United States?
Maybe it isn't fear and emotion.
Maybe it's just understanding that it probably isn't different this time?
Just a thought.
==================
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
Sigh.
I find it amazing that what seems so obvious escapes the consciousness of so many.
The latest to wake up and smell the coffee are the brilliant economists at the National Bank who have come out with the insightful conclusion that the impact of rising interest rates on the residential housing sector "could be dire" in Canada.
Really? Whodathunkit?
“Though the Bank of Canada has done well to set its rate normalization process in motion, the fact remains that the stakes at play are high, with home prices and household debt at record levels relative to income,” economists Matthieu Arseneau and Yanick Desnoyers said in a report. “The residential real estate sector, which is extremely sensitive to interest rate fluctuations, could have the wind knocked out of its sails if interest rates do nothing more than normalize.”
No kidding.
And what will happen if they do more than 'normalize'?
The impact on our Country, economy and government finances is going to be severe.
Once again, I shake my head.
Arseneau and Desnoyers are right, but where was this insightful analysis when the blogosphere was initially sounding the alarm last year?
Meanwhile the Toronto Star has taken these observations to their logical conclusion and noted that the CMHC is Canada's very own ticking time bomb.
The Star article concludes exactly what has been said here for the last 18 months... that the CMHC is "a potential financial disaster lurking just over the horizon, waiting to put us into the real world of true financial crisis."
Sigh... we are so screwed.
I am reminded of events in mid 2008. The United States was spiraling into recession and our politicians steadfastly maintained we would not be effected.
As world events continue to spin wildly, we continue to believe that we will not be impacted.
We are watching a 5.9% annual decline in the M3 money supply, the deepest decline since the early 1930s banking crisis. This is a post World War II record drop in the inflation-adjusted M3 and it signals an intensifying business contraction. Many observers believe we are heading for a renewed recession and it will set the stage for a U.S. solvency crisis and severe inflation threat.
Meanwhile British Prime Minister Cameron has come out and that the UK deficit is worse than 'previously thought'. That's British for "oh sh*t".
Tempering the UK announcement is word that that the U.S. government’s total debt will risee past $13 trillion for the first time in history later this month. The amount owed will surpass GDP in 2012, based on forecasts by the International Monetary Fund.
“Over the long term, interest rates on government debt will likely have to rise to attract investors,” said Hiroki Shimazu, a market economist in Tokyo at Nikko Cordial Securities Inc., a unit of Japan’s third-largest publicly traded bank. “That will be a big burden on the government and the people.”
THAT, my friends, is the understatement of the year.
Just as Canada could not escape the effects of the recession which swept over the US in 2008, nor will we escape the impact of the sovereign debt crisis that is bearing down on the UK and US.
As all this plays out, you don't want to be carrying debt... especially hundreds of thousands of dollars in mortgage debt.
==================
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.
History of Central Banks and why we must End the Federal Reserve
- Ralph Nader on CNN
The author(s) of the posts on this site are not investment advisors and they do not offer investment advice. They try to provide some hopefully useful data with sources - especially concerning real estate - and then add their own analysis.
All the content on this website is solely an expression of the author's personal interests and is posted as free-of-charge opinion and commentary. Nothing here is intended as investment advice. If you seek investment advice, consult a registered, qualified investment advisor.