Showing posts with label Unemployment figures. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Unemployment figures. Show all posts

Saturday, August 8, 2009

"Eye"

US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke recently testified to Congress that he foresaw a “jobless recovery” on the horizon.

Jobless recovery?

How can an economy burdened with double-digit unemployment recover without new jobs?

In recent decades there have been some jobless recoveries from mild recessions, but they were built upon asset booms.

Today we face a very deep recession as the asset boom has collapsed (althought in the Village on the Edge of the Rainforest this is still pending). A jobless recovery in an economy based on 72% consumer spending is an oxymoron. Unless our economy can go through a needed and painful reorganization, in which the industrial sector is revitalized, recovery from this recession will have to be based upon consumer demand.

But with unemployment in the US increasing at over 500,000 workers a month (and 45,000 in Canada), with wages dropping, and with hours worked declining, it is hard to see consumer demand rising convincingly enough to provide the engine for a rebound.

Meanwhile, U.S. Treasury debt is exploding, the U.S. dollar falling, and unemployment rising.

Added to this conundrum, credit remains tight, despite the injection into the banks of vast amounts of Fed funds at zero percent. And, for the first time, banks are being paid interest on the reserves required to be held at the Fed. Paradoxically, this hidden taxpayer boost to banks’ earnings is one of the prime reasons for tight credit. What bank would lend to corporations or individuals, incurring risk, when it can lend to the Fed – at considerable profit – without risk?

With the consumer still in shock and denied credit, why do some indicators appear positive?

The short answer for this is massive deficit and stimulus spending by our federal governments.

That's why some consumers have ‘handout’ money to spend. And it’s no surprise that after a massive sell-off, certain retailers are refilling their inventories, causing the Purchasing Managers’ Index to rise.

But looking ahead, there is a $3.4 trillion commercial mortgage problem due to face the US banks in September and a huge wave of residential mortgage defaults to come.

When you combine this with the various pressures on consumers, it appears to me that we aren't on the cusp of any recovery, but that we are actually in the ‘eye’ of an economic hurricane.

When jobs fail to materialize and credit remains frozen, look for corporate earnings to remain depressed. This reality can only be ignored for so long.

US equities have just come off their best July since 1989. Overall, the market is up over 8% for the year. But history has a parrallel to today.

March 1989 also saw a huge run up. It was followed by an even stronger rally in July, during which volume dried up. It appears the same is happening now. What came next in 1989 was a big sell-off in September, followed by an even greater one in October.

Don't look now, but history tends to repeat itself.

Also, consider the fundamental picture. We have rallied 48% from the March lows on the back of what? Good earnings? Good employment figures? Good spending figures? Expanding GDP?

No.

We have rallied based on one of the largest and most concerted propaganda campaigns ever waged, supported by government stimulus. But no government can stimulate forever. The bottom line is this, if Americans and Canadians do not return to work, THERE IS NO RECOVERY.

Compounding all of this is another job-loss statistic.

According to Seeking Alpha, 13 million Americans will lose their benefits by years' end. And these Americans are not returning to work because they are losing their benefits, they are exhausting their benefits.

There are 30 million people in the United States on food stamps. There are only 200 million working-age Americans (age 15-64). Unemployment has been estimated by many good economists as being around 20%. Unfortunately for these people, their nanny-government lifeboats are slowly running out of air.

Those 3 million people who lost their jobs in the second half of last year? Once you factor in their dependants, that equals 10 million people who have no income and no savings.

And how about the other 4 million others who lost their jobs in the first half of this year? They will be next. The numbers get so depressing, I hate to even count them up.

As I have said before, unemployed people don't spend money. They don't buy technologies, or durables, or even pay their mortgage. US bankruptcies are up 600% in this recent downturn. And that includes the time after Congress affected new rules to make bankruptcy harder.

So who is going to pay for anything when they are struggling to buy groceries?

If the equity averages are already rallying on the back of these horrible stats, there is nowhere to go but down when the real truth sets in.

When the realization comes, look for another round of collapses. I see the stock market crashing below 5,000 on the DOW.

Particularly if autumn heralds a rise in interest rates.

==================

Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.


Please read disclaimer at bottom of blog.

Friday, July 3, 2009

Green Shoots?

On the day before Independence Day, a few more items from our neighbour to the South and a stunning item from Canada.

Yesterday's post triggered a number of disbelieving emails about this statement...

"And as bad as that is, the really bad news is that measuring unemployment the correct way (ie. the way it was done in the 1970s vs. the modified formula now used) shows that the US unemployment rate has actually shot past the 20% mark! One out of five Americans is unemployed."

It used to be that the figures told you the number of people who were truly out of a job. Now The official unemployment statistics only record the number of people who have recently lost their jobs. After a certain period of time, they are not considered 'unemployed'.

The 'official' US unemployment rate now stands at 9.4%.

But as I said, that figure does not reflect the total number of Americans who are truly out of a job. I don't have an online reference for you that 'over 20%' statistic, however I invite you to check out this op-ed column by Bob Herbert in the Saturday New York Times.

Herbert notes that for every job opening in the USA, there are more than five unemployed actively seeking work vying for those jobs. That is unprecedented and nearly double what we saw at the depths of the 2001 recession. The official ranks of the unemployed have doubled during this recession in the United States to 14 million and if you take into account all forms of labour market slack, the unofficial number is bordering on 30 million, another record.

Herbert cites the Center for Labour Market Studies at Northeastern University which estimates that the real unemployment now stands at 18.2%.

FYI, that is actually higher than the posted rate at the end of the 1930s - a time when they didn't play these 'rabbit-out-of-a-hat' games to lower the official unemployment statistics.

Bank Failure Friday

As faithful readers know, bank failures in the US always seemed to carried out on Friday afternoons. There have been so many regular failures week after week that Friday has jokingly come to be called 'Bank Failure Friday' in many economic blogs.

I have taken a break from posting the failures this past month (last post was on June 5th to report Bank Failure #37), but that doesn't mean the failures have stopped.

As of last week, the total number of Bank Failures in the US for 2009 was up to 45.

This week will see a cascade of failures, a record week for 2009. Perhaps it is because of the July 4th weekend, but the FDIC has jumped the gun and a wave of failures was announced yesterday.

Here's the damage for this week's tally so far:

Bank Failure #46: Rock River Bank, Oregon, Illinois
Bank Failure #47: First State Bank of Winchester, Winchester, Illinois
Bank Failure #48: John Warner Bank, Clinton, Illinois
Bank Failure #49: First National Bank of Danville, Danville, Illinois
Bank Failure #50: Elizabeth State Bank, Elizabeth, Illinois
Bank Failure #51: Millennium State Bank of Texas, Dallas, Texas
Bank Failure #52: PrivateBank and Trust Company, Chicago, Illinois

That's 7 and counting. We'll see if the total is run up some more as the day progresses.

Crushing Weight of Canadian Debt

You've already seen posts on this site about the worrisome levels of Canadian Household Debt, and now you will see those concerns come to fruition.

A new report from Equifax Canada says that more than half a million Canadians have fallen behind on their various credit payments, fuelling a 19% rise in the average national delinquency rate in the one-year period ending May 31, 2009.

The credit bureau called the double-digit jump "alarming" and notes much of the trouble stemms from missed payments on credit card bills and for sales finance purchases of items such as furniture and electronics. Equifax defines delinquent bills as those that are at least 90 days overdue.

The Equifax report is only the latest study to suggest that increasing numbers of Canadians are struggling to pay their bills.

Rising delinquencies in the areas identified by the Equifax Report are a portent of cascading debt problems. Consumers tend to miss payments on those unsecured credit products before they fail to pay back collateral-backed loans such as mortgages, bank loans and lines of credit.

We will see if the dominos continue to fall in that direction.

The Equifax data follows a Bank of Canada report last month that suggested climbing debt levels have put households under increased financial strain amid the recession. The BOC report also said that households are increasingly vulnerable to "adverse shocks" such as higher unemployment.

We look forward to the next round of Canadian employment figures.

==================

Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post

Monday, June 22, 2009

Reality vs Fantasy

On Saturday we talked about the surge in real estate prices fueled by the goverments excessive, all time low, interest rates.

The fantasyland of a return to real estate boom times is hitting hard against the reality of the actual economy as the latest EI figures are released.

The number of British Columbians collecting employment insurance climbed again in April, rising by another 1,400 recipients. Statistics Canada said that the total number of EI recipients in B.C. hit 82,700 people, up 1.7% from the month before.

This now represents a dramatic rise in EI recipients in BC.

Since October 2008, the total percentage increase in EI is an astonishing 81.6% (37,200 people).

"Between April 2008 and April 2009, the increase in the number of beneficiaries in British Columbia was widespread, tripling in Cranbrook, Kelowna and Campbell River, and doubling in most other major centers," Statistics Canada said in a news release.

"In Victoria, the number of beneficiaries increased by 2,500 to 3,900, while in Vancouver, there were 34,500 people receiving regular benefits, an increase of 20,500 over 12 months."

Statistics Canada said that the province's hardest hit sectors in terms of job losses includes construction, transportation and warehousing, accommodation and food services, finance and insurance as well as forestry and logging.

My email box has been filled these last two days with comments from readers who despair about the latest surge in the real estate market.

"How can prices be going up?", they ask.

The fact of the matter is that our governments are desperate to stall and stave off continued declines in real estate values in the hope that the economy can be resuscitated.

It is the natural reaction of people to protect what they have (and thus the natural reaction of governments). Unfortunately we live in a capitalist oriented system, and the nature of that system is to tear down what isn't working and allow capital/resources to redeploy.

When this process happens every few generations, it triggers a very painful but necessary chain of events.

And it takes the extraordinary politician to allow it to happen.

Regrettably a politician that facilitates it will probably fail to win re-election. Thus we have politicians who meddle and that meddling often exacerbates the situation.

Thus our government has slashed the Bank of Canada rate to an astounding 0.25% in an attempt to prevent capitalism's 'creative destruction'. And the cheap money is doing it's job by stimulating buying to create a temporary effect.

But it is temporary.

The reality of our economic situation is that unemployment is at an 11-year high. Our manufacturing sector been decimated, our major car companies are bankrupt, Air Canada - our national airline - is being bailed out, retail sales are plunging and our federal government’s finances have been utterly trashed leading to the greatest deficit in the history of our country.

In light of all this, is buying real estate property at the current prices really a smart idea?

Cheap money is leveraging the market right now.

Increasing unemployment, closed up factories, rising mortgage rates, soaring energy costs, record household and mortgage debt levels and the inevitable surge of higher taxes is going to take it's toll.

The fall of the real estate market is going to be all the more harder and sharper when it comes.

The story here isn't amazement that the buying frenzy has returned.

The real story is understanding how it is that people can't see what's coming.

================

Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.

Disclaimer: The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including advertisements, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.

Thursday, April 9, 2009

March Job Losses to be Announced Today

.
UPDATE: Jobless rate hits 7 year high.

61,000 fulltime jobs announced as lost in March,
BC saw steepest job losses - 23,000 jobs,
8% unemployment,
Over 357,000 jobs lost in last 5 months, the largest five-month plunge since the deep 1982 recession.
.

Statistics Canada will release the March employment data at 7 a.m. eastern time today. And the figures will not be pretty.

Canada has been shedding jobs at a faster rate than the United States and that trend did not abate over the last month. It will be the fifth straight month of job losses and the outlook for the summer is no better.

"I expect the numbers will continue to be worse over the next several months," Finance Minister Jim Flaherty told reporters in Oshawa on Wednesday. "I expect tomorrow's numbers to be not encouraging. When we lose jobs, it takes a long time to turn that around."

The median forecast of analysts surveyed by Reuters is for the economy to shed 55,000 jobs in March and for the unemployment rate to rise to 8% from 7.7% in February.

Personally I predict a much worse result and anticipate the statistics will show that the economy shed 60,000 - 80,000 jobs in March, up to 80% higher than the 'median forecast of analysts'. Look for the Canadian dollar to take a hit as well.

Look for the situation in BC to be particularly poor. And the impact to start catching up on Real Estate by the end of summer.

=================

The numbers by Province are now in. BC lost 23,000 full time jobs, Alberta lost 15,000 & Ontario lost 11,000.

The numbers for British Columbia are even more devestating when you consider that BC's population is 4,419,974. Ontario's population is 12,986,857.

BC had more than twice as many full time job losses as Ontario, but has one-third the population of Ontario.

On a per capita basis, BC was devestated last month. And all signs point to the trend continuing through April.

==================

Email: village_whisperer@live.ca