Greenspan: "Time to let the markets power recovery"

Yesterday I made a post about former US Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan's speech to the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.

Greenspan made some interesting comments about Gold, but that wasn't the only point of interest.

Of particular note for real estate observers in the Village on the Edge of the Rainforest, were comments made about government stimulus.

The still influential Greenspan said fiscal stimulus efforts have fallen far short of expectations, and the government now needs to get out of the way and allow businesses and markets to power the recovery.

“We have to find a way to simmer down the extent of activism that is going on” with government stimulus spending “and allow the economy to heal” itself.

At this point, “we’d probably be better off doing less than more” because “you’d be far better off to allow the normal market forces to operate here," Greenspan said. That’s largely because stimulus spending is not proving as effective as many had hoped. “To the extent the evidence suggests very large deficits concurrently crowd out capital investment, there is a debit to the stimulus program that is somewhere between a third and a half of what the gross stimulus is,” he said.

Greenspan said that the U.S. needs to do something now to deal with budget deficits and it must do something very soon. He explained his anxiety is so high that “I’m coming out in the first time in my memory” in support of higher taxes in addition to reduced spending, including allowing the so-called Bush tax cuts to expire.

“Our choice is not between good and bad; it’s between terrible and worse,” Greenspan said. The nation has “a level of commitment... which I don’t think we can psychically meet,” absent huge changes in how the government finances itself.

These are, once again, stunning statements with potentially massive reprecussions for Vancouver.

The ONLY reason interest rates are so low is because of government intervention.

Given the current state of the worldwide economy and the capital demands of governments, if interest rates were let to float to market level the impact would be profound.

Rates would, at the very least, return to their historical norm over the last twenty years of 8.25%. Government has been manipulating those rates for the last 10 years and the time for that intervention is coming to an end.

When this all plays out, Vancouver real estate is going to implode on a level even the staunchest of bears cannot fathom.

Meanwhile in Victoria

Vancouver has had three consecutive months of dismal real estate sales and September is shaping up to make it four in a row with sales down about 40% from last year.

But that's nothing compared to Victoria where September is on track for a collapse in sales of 75%.

And finally, from the Hyperinflation Debate

Harry Schultz, author of the famous International Harry Schultz Letter [IHSL], has had a long and colourful financial career.

Much like Gonzalo Lira, he is fascinated by the possibility that hyperinflation might be triggered quickly, by a sort of global financial traffic accident. Back on June 10th, 2010 he wrote:

• "We (collectively) are poised at a heart-stopping moment in economic times. On the one extreme side, the world is on the edge of massive deflation and depression. At the other extreme ... hyperinflation. My view is: Both these extremes are possible. Certainly deflation is, on balance, in play today and gaining ground as money supply is actually declining! Hyperinflation seems impossible when there is not much inflation in most economies. But... hyperinflation is a monetary event, not an economic one, and will happen on an overnight basis, not via a general uptrend in inflation data."

At age 89, Schultz is winding up his businesses and will wind up his IHSL at the end of this year. In the latest letter he summarizing the account of how hyperinflation could happen by Gonzalo Lira and describes Lira's scenario as “a genuine risk” and comments:

• “Hyperinflation can be triggered in several other ways. Trustfailure (my new word) is the controlling element, which triggers Fearflation (another new word). E.g., a Comex gold delivery default or a major Too-Big-To-Fail bank failure or a self-propelling domino bank-run are all possible triggers. A bond market implosion will result from any of the above, even if it isn’t itself the trigger.”

==================

Email: village_whisperer@live.ca

Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.

Please read disclaimer at bottom of blog.

Delusional

Last Autumn, when the markets were melting down, I made an observation that I still hold to today.

What occurred in 2008 was a significant financial earthquake and we still do not completely appreciate the full repercussions of what occurred.

I believe that statement holds true today.

It's one of the primary reasons I am still extremely bearish on the outlook for real estate in the world's most bubbly city: Vancouver.

On Tuesday we saw financial markets tumble as credit-rating agencies slashed Greece and Dubai government related debt.

Looming on the horizon will be downgrades to similar debt issued by the United Kingdom and the United States.

It has too.

The fiscal imbalances and accumulated debt that has built up from trying to rescue our economy from the financial crisis is piling onto an already massive amount of government debt.

As David Rosenberg, chief economist and strategist at Gluskin Sheff in Toronto, said yesterday, "Anybody who thinks we are through this credit collapse is delusional. It is ongoing."

That message was echoed by this week on CNBC by Meredith Whitney, a former analyst at the investment bank Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.

Whitney, who has her own firm now, is renowned for calling out the problems with banks' toxic assets before the issue became widespread.

And what she forecasts for 2010 is anything but positive.

Whitney said that she believes government is running out of ways to help the economy as the US faces major issues regarding credit and employment.

"I think they're out of bullets," she said.

Whitney keyed in on the main reason that all the improvement we are seeing is, in fact, a false recovery. Despite being able to borrow at near-zero percent interest, banks are not taking that money and putting it back into the marketplace.

Consumer lending dropped 1.7% on an annualized basis in October, the ninth straight monthly decline. Whitney noted that consumers are "getting kicked out of the financial system" as the stimulus money is cycled to the banks bottom line and feeds a speculative frenzy in the stock market.

"What's so frustrating is you have an administration that is arguing such a populist (ideology) and not appreciating all the unintended consequences that the consumer and small businesses have far less credit," Whitney said.

With consumer spending making up about 70% of gross domestic product, the inability of even credit-worthy consumers being able to be able to borrow will put a severe headlock on future growth.

And that means there will be no economic recovery - at least not on a scale both the United States and Canada need to see.

"I have 100% conviction that the consumer is not getting any better and there's not more liquidity," Whitney said.

"I don't think you can cut taxes enough to stimulate demand," Whitney said. "For a 2010 prediction, which is so disturbing on so many levels to have so many Americans be kicked out of the financial system and the consequences both political and economic of that, it's a real issue. You can't get around it. This has never happened before in this country."

When you combine a failed 'immaculate economic recovery' with a need to service massive amounts of government debt, you soon realize that we are in the midst of a huge paradigm shift in North America.

The average Joe simply does not appreciate what our economic future holds for us.

As Rosenberg said, "Anybody who thinks we are through this... is delusional.

==================

Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.

Please read disclaimer at bottom of blog.

Opportunity

Vancouver's sales numbers for October are out and the average price has pushed higher yet again. Graph above comes from Larry Yatkowsky's website. Click on image above to enlarge.

We have almost reached the previous highs and it's interesting to see how the latest numbers are casting despair amongst those who have been expecting a correction in the Lower Mainland Real Estate market.

Some have speculated that the Vancouver market and it's numbers may be the first to prove the 'bubble pattern' incorrect. That 'pattern' would be the playing out of the bubble lifecycle graph which represents the way all bubbles have corrected themselves in the past (click on image to enlarge).

The Rainforest Roundtable was discussing this very issue last night. We would humbly suggest the bubble lifecycle theory is correct, it's the assumption that the Vancouver market had reached it's peak that was incorrect.

Don't get the wrong impression though - our market is in a bubble and it will burst.

The current rise is attributable to one thing and one thing only: government intervention.

Anytime central banks intervene and pump billions or trillions of dollars into the financial system, a bubble is created that must eventually deflate.

Rather than allow the market to correct itself and clear away the worst excesses of the boom period, North American governments have colluded to create another bubble.

By attempting to cushion our economy from the worst shocks of last year's financial collapse, the Bank of Canada and CMHC have ensured that the ultimate correction of this mess will be more severe than it should have been.

As US Senator Ron Paul noted yesterday, "as the housing market fails to return to any sense of normalcy, commercial real estate begins to collapse and manufacturers produce goods that cannot be purchased by debt-strapped consumers, the economy will falter... government intervention cannot lead to economic growth."

The rationalizations for why the economy is recovering will intensify, as will the delusions that BC (and Canada) will not be affected. We will hear the same sort of platitudes we heard last year when we were Canada and BC would not suffer from the recession in the US and that we would not fall into deficit spending).

What we have is a false recovery. I agree completely with Ron Paul who said, "I am reminded of the outlook in 1930, when the experts were certain that the worst of the Depression was over and that recovery was just around the corner. The economy and stock market seemed to be recovering, and there was optimism that the recession, like many of those before it, would be over in a year or less. Instead, the interventionist policies of Hoover and Roosevelt caused the Depression to worsen, and the Dow Jones industrial average did not recover to 1929 levels until 1954. I fear that our stimulus and bailout programs have already done too much to prevent the economy from recovering in a natural manner and will result in yet another asset bubble."

We are in the eye of the economic hurricane that stated last year. And this is a great thing for Canada and the Lower Mainland. It represents an unbelievable reprieve.

The bubble lifecycle WILL play itself out. But after the freezing up of the real estate market last November, Canadians have been given an astounding opportunity to recognize what is coming and prepare.

And that is a good thing. What more could you ask for?

==================

Email: village_whisperer@live.ca
Click 'comments' below to contribute to this post.

Please read disclaimer at bottom of blog.